Cut Privacy Compliance Time by 60% Across Every Entity and Jurisdiction
Comparing Kertos vs Vanta? Neither was built to run multi-entity privacy programs. See why teams at an aircraft manufacturer, a Swiss insurer, and a medical technology company chose a purpose-built, Swiss-hosted alternative instead.
Book Your Demo
You're Not Just Looking for a Compliance Tool. You're Trying to Run a Privacy Program Across an Entire Organization
If you're comparing Kertos and Vanta, you've already realized that generic compliance platforms aren't built for the complexity you're dealing with. Here's what we hear from teams like yours every week.
78%
IAPP Governance Report, 2023, multi-entity organizations surveyed
Multi-Entity Complexity Is the Real Challenge
If you're managing privacy compliance for a single entity in a single country, almost any tool works. But you're not. You're managing 5, 15, maybe 50+ entities across the EU, Switzerland, APAC, or the Americas, each with its own processing activities, legal bases, and regulatory requirements.
78% of multi-entity organizations still manage Records of Processing Activities in spreadsheets. That's not a compliance program. It's a liability waiting to surface.
Result: Aircraft manufacturer eliminated spreadsheet-based ROPA management across subsidiaries in their first 6 months with Priverion.
60%
Aircraft manufacturer, compliance admin time spent on manual ROPA updates before Priverion
ROPA Recertification Shouldn't Be a Quarterly Fire Drill
Your Records of Processing Activities are scattered across spreadsheets, outdated SharePoint files, and the inboxes of DPOs who left the company two years ago. Recertification either doesn't happen or it consumes entire weeks, chasing business units across subsidiaries for updates that arrive incomplete.
Both Kertos and Vanta offer ROPA features. Neither offers automated recertification workflows designed for organizations with dozens of group entities and varying maturity levels.
Result: a Swiss insurer achieved 100% ROPA recertification rate with fully automated workflows across all entities.
2
Distinct disciplines , security compliance and privacy compliance require different tools
Security Compliance and Privacy Compliance Are Not the Same Discipline
Vanta was built for security compliance . SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA. Kertos leans into privacy automation and data discovery. But a mature privacy program requires governance, accountability, DPIAs, transfer impact assessments, breach notification workflows, and cross-border data transfer management. These aren't bolt-on features , they're the foundation.
You need a tool built by privacy professionals, for privacy professionals. Where your compliance data is hosted , and under whose jurisdiction , isn't a footnote. In a post-Schrems II world, it's a legal requirement.
Result: a medical technology company saved 200+ hours in ISO 27001 preparation using Priverion's integrated privacy and security framework coverage.
200+
Hours saved on ROPA management
A medical technology company reclaimed 200+ hours during ISO 27001 preparation by replacing manual processes with automated compliance workflows.
60%
Lower compliance admin time
Aircraft manufacturer achieved a 60% reduction in compliance admin time within 6 months , at a fraction of the cost of per-user, per-module pricing models.
3 mo
Ahead of schedule on ISO 27001
A medical technology company accelerated their ISO 27001 certification timeline by three months using Priverion's audit-ready evidence packages and automated documentation.
How Kertos, Vanta, and Priverion Actually Compare
An honest capability comparison across the dimensions that matter for multi-entity privacy program management. We've noted where competitors excel and where we have limitations.
| Capability | Kertos | Vanta | Priverion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Privacy Program Fundamentals | |||
| ROPA management | Basic ROPA with automated data discovery | Available, security-compliance oriented | Full ROPA with automated recertification across all group entities |
| DPIA / TIA automation | Limited DPIA support | Not a core focus | AI-assisted drafting, risk scoring, and regulatory mapping |
| Data subject request handling | Available | Limited | Full DSR workflow management across entities |
| Incident management and breach notification | Basic | Security incident focused | Complete breach notification workflows with regulatory timelines |
| Multi-Entity and Group Management | |||
| Multi-subsidiary management | Limited , primarily single-entity focused | Available for security frameworks, less mature for privacy | Purpose-built for groups with 5 to 50+ entities across jurisdictions |
| Cross-entity data mapping | Data discovery focused | Asset inventory oriented | Group-wide visibility across all subsidiaries from a single dashboard |
| Centralized DPO oversight | Limited | Not a core feature | Dedicated DPO dashboard for operational oversight across all entities |
| Framework Coverage | |||
| GDPR | Yes | Yes | Yes , deep coverage including SCC management |
| Swiss FADP / nDSG | Limited | Not a focus | Native support , built in Switzerland for Swiss regulations |
| ISO 27001 / ISO 27701 | Not a core focus | Strong ISO 27001 coverage | Full coverage for both standards |
| EU AI Act readiness | Not available | Not available | AI Register for EU AI Act compliance readiness |
| SOC 2 | Not a focus | Core strength . Vanta's primary use case | Not covered , we focus on privacy and data protection frameworks |
| Infrastructure and Trust | |||
| Data hosting | EU-hosted | US-hosted (AWS) | Swiss-hosted , all data processing within Swiss infrastructure |
| AI approach | Automation and data discovery | Automation for evidence collection | AI-assisted with human oversight. No customer data used for model training. |
| Pricing model | Custom pricing | Per-framework, tiered pricing | Based on number of entities and organizational size , no per-user traps |
| Time to value | Weeks | Days to weeks for security compliance | Operational in weeks . Aircraft manufacturer saw results in first 6 months including implementation |
| What We Don't Do (Honest Limitations) | |||
| Cookie consent management | Available | Not a focus | Not covered |
| ESG / Ethics hotlines | Not available | Not available | Not covered , we focus exclusively on privacy program management |
| Automated data discovery / scanning | Core strength , strong automated data mapping | Strong for security asset inventory | Not our approach , we focus on governance-driven data mapping with business unit input |
Kertos excels at automated data discovery. Vanta is strong for SOC 2 and security compliance. If those are your primary needs, they may be the better fit. If you need purpose-built privacy program management across multiple entities and jurisdictions , that's where Priverion leads.
Enterprise-grade without enterprise complexity
Mid-market companies managing privacy across multiple subsidiaries need a platform built for their reality , not a stripped-down version of a tool designed for Fortune 500 budgets.
The typical enterprise platform experience
Per-user, per-module pricing
Costs balloon unpredictably as you onboard subsidiaries and team members. Every new module means a new invoice line.
US-hosted infrastructure
Post-Schrems II, routing compliance data through US cloud providers creates the exact cross-border transfer risk you're trying to manage.
200+ shallow integrations
Impressive on a features page. In practice, most connectors require custom maintenance and rarely touch the systems privacy teams actually use.
6-month implementation cycles
By the time you're live, the regulation has evolved and half your project team has rotated.
Built for single-entity GRC
Group-wide privacy management bolted on as an afterthought. Managing 12 subsidiaries feels like managing 12 separate instances.
The Priverion experience
Predictable pricing by company size
Based on number of entities and organizational size , not per-user or per-module. No expansion traps. Your CFO will appreciate the forecast accuracy.
Swiss-built, Swiss-hosted
All data processing within Swiss infrastructure. European data residency guaranteed. In a post-Schrems II world, this isn't a marketing checkbox . it's a legal requirement for cross-border transfers.
Deep integrations where it matters
Purpose-built connections with HR, procurement, and IT asset management systems , the tools privacy workflows actually touch. Fewer integrations, zero maintenance overhead.
Operational in weeks, not months
Aircraft manufacturer saw a 60% reduction in compliance admin time within their first 6 months , including the implementation period.
Aircraft manufacturer case study, first 6 months post-deployment
Built for group-wide privacy from day one
One platform, one view across every subsidiary and jurisdiction. Automated ROPA recertification, cross-entity data mapping, and centralized DPO oversight , not 12 separate spreadsheets pretending to be a program.
An honest note: we don't cover ESG, ethics hotlines, or cookie consent. If you need a sprawling GRC suite, we're not the right fit. If you need privacy program management that works across your entire group , that's exactly what we built.
From spreadsheet chaos to strategic privacy management
"Before Priverion, we were spending the majority of our compliance admin time chasing business units across subsidiaries for ROPA updates. Within six months of deployment, we cut that administrative burden by 60%. Our DPO now focuses on strategic privacy work instead of spreadsheet maintenance , that's the transformation we needed."
Aircraft manufacturer , multi-subsidiary enterprise, first 6 months with Priverion
"We evaluated several platforms before choosing Priverion. What convinced us was the group-wide approach , we needed a single view across all entities with automated recertification, not another tool that would require us to manage each subsidiary separately. We achieved 100% ROPA recertification rate with fully automated workflows."
A Swiss insurer , 100% automated ROPA recertification across all entities
Common questions when comparing Kertos, Vanta, and Priverion
Is Priverion a direct competitor to Kertos and Vanta?
Partially. Kertos focuses on privacy automation and data discovery , strong capabilities for organizations that need automated data mapping. Vanta is primarily a security compliance platform (SOC 2, ISO 27001) with growing privacy features. Priverion is purpose-built for privacy program management across multiple entities and jurisdictions. If your primary need is SOC 2 compliance, Vanta is likely the better choice. If you need automated data discovery as a starting point, Kertos has strengths there. If you need to run a mature privacy program across a group of companies, Priverion is built for exactly that.
Can Priverion scale to 50+ entities?
Yes. We serve groups with 50+ entities across multiple jurisdictions. The platform was designed from day one for multi-entity complexity , not retrofitted from a single-entity tool. Cross-entity data mapping, centralized DPO dashboards, and automated recertification workflows all operate at group level.
Why does Swiss hosting matter for a privacy tool?
After the Schrems II ruling invalidated the EU-US Privacy Shield, any transfer of personal data to US-based infrastructure requires additional safeguards. If your compliance platform itself routes data through US cloud providers, you're creating the exact cross-border transfer risk you're trying to manage. Swiss data protection law is recognized as adequate by the EU, and Swiss infrastructure falls outside US jurisdiction , making it the strongest foundation for European compliance data.
How does Priverion's AI work, and is it safe for compliance data?
Priverion uses AI-assisted features for DPIA drafting, risk scoring, and regulatory mapping. The key distinction: AI assists human decision-making but never replaces it. All AI outputs are reviewed before becoming compliance records. No customer data is used for model training. All data processing occurs within Swiss infrastructure. We use "AI-assisted" deliberately , not "AI-powered" , because human oversight is non-negotiable in compliance.
What doesn't Priverion do?
We don't cover ESG reporting, ethics hotlines, cookie consent management, or SOC 2 compliance. We also don't offer automated data discovery or scanning , our approach is governance-driven data mapping with business unit input. We're not built for single-entity companies where a simpler tool would suffice. Our strength is group-wide privacy program management, and we focus exclusively on doing that well.
How long does implementation take?
Priverion is operational in weeks, not months. Aircraft manufacturer saw a 60% reduction in compliance admin time within their first 6 months , and that includes the implementation period. We don't require 6-month deployment cycles because the platform is designed for rapid onboarding across group entities.
How does pricing work?
Priverion pricing is based on the number of companies in your group and organizational size , not per-user or per-module. This means predictable costs without expansion traps as you onboard new subsidiaries or team members. If you're used to enterprise platforms where every new capability requires a new budget approval, this is a different experience.
Stop managing privacy compliance in spreadsheets. Start managing it as a program.
An aircraft manufacturer cut compliance admin time by 60% in their first six months. A Swiss insurer hit 100% automated ROPA recertification. A medical technology company saved 200+ hours preparing for ISO 27001.
In 30 minutes, we'll show you exactly how multi-entity privacy management works when it's built for groups like yours , with AI-assisted automation, Swiss data sovereignty, and pricing that doesn't punish you for growing.
Group-wide ROPA automation
Swiss-hosted infrastructure
Predictable pricing, no per-user traps
No sales pitch , just a live 30-minute walkthrough tailored to your entity structure and compliance needs.
