The Kertos Alternative Built for Multi-Entity Privacy Programs
Managing compliance across subsidiaries, jurisdictions, and hundreds of processing activities? Priverion gives enterprise privacy teams one platform to run their entire program , with Swiss hosting, automated recertification, and group-wide visibility.
Free. No commitment. See your use case in 30 minutes.
Why Privacy Teams Start Looking for Kertos Alternatives
These aren't hypothetical frustrations. They're the exact problems we hear from every DPO managing compliance across a group structure.
78%
of multi-entity organizations still manage RoPAs in spreadsheets , IAPP Governance Report, 2023
Your tool treats 50 subsidiaries like one company
Most privacy platforms were designed for single-entity compliance. When you're managing ROPA, DPIAs, and data subject requests across dozens of legal entities, you end up building workarounds in spreadsheets , defeating the purpose of having a platform in the first place.
Result: Priverion's native multi-entity architecture eliminated spreadsheet workarounds entirely for Aircraft manufacturer's cross-subsidiary compliance program.
Aircraft manufacturer , first 6 months of deployment
60%
of compliance admin time spent on manual ROPA updates before Priverion , Aircraft manufacturer, 2024
Recertification is manual , and records go stale within weeks
If your Records of Processing Activities aren't automatically recertified on a schedule, they're out of date the moment an audit begins. Manual follow-ups with process owners across a group structure don't scale , and every week without recertification is another week of audit exposure.
Result: AXA achieved 100% ROPA recertification rate with fully automated workflows , no more chasing process owners by email.
AXA , automated recertification across all entities
5+
regulatory frameworks supported natively , GDPR, FADP, LGPD, POPIA, and more
One regulatory lens forces your team to manage every gap manually
GDPR, FADP, LGPD, POPIA , each framework has nuances in documentation requirements, legal bases, and notification timelines. A platform that only handles one regulatory lens forces your team to manage every cross-border gap with manual workarounds and external legal counsel.
200+
Hours saved on ROPA management
Medtec reclaimed 200+ hours during ISO 27001 preparation by replacing manual ROPA tracking with automated recertification workflows.
60%
Lower cost vs. OneTrust
Based on Priverion's per-company pricing model versus per-user, per-module enterprise pricing , measured across multi-entity deployments with 10+ subsidiaries.
3 mo
Ahead of schedule on ISO 27001
Medtec achieved certification-ready status three months ahead of their original timeline by using Priverion's integrated audit evidence packages.
Built for the mid-market. Not stripped down from the enterprise.
OneTrust serves Fortune 500 organizations with broader GRC scope and dedicated privacy teams. Priverion was designed for DPOs who need group-wide compliance without a six-figure contract or a six-month implementation.
Priverion
Swiss data sovereignty , by design
All data processed and stored within Swiss infrastructure. In a post-Schrems II world, this isn't a preference . it's a legal safeguard for cross-border data transfers.
Operational in weeks, not months
Aircraft manufacturer went live across multiple subsidiaries and saw a 60% reduction in compliance admin time within their first six months. No armies of consultants required.
Aircraft manufacturer case study , first 6 months post-implementation
All-in-one privacy platform
ROPA, DPIA, vendor risk, incident management, DSR handling, AI Act readiness, and cross-entity data mapping , unified in a single platform. No module upsells, no surprise invoices.
Predictable, mid-market pricing
Pricing based on number of companies and organizational size , not per-user or per-module. Your compliance budget stays predictable as your team grows.
AI that assists, never decides
AI-assisted DPIA drafting, risk scoring, and regulatory mapping , all processed within Swiss infrastructure. Every AI output is reviewed by your team before it becomes a compliance record. No customer data is used for model training.
Deep integrations where it matters
Purpose-built integrations with HR, procurement, and IT asset management systems , the tools that actually feed privacy workflows. Not 200 shallow connectors that create maintenance overhead.
Typical enterprise platforms
US-hosted, US-owned
Most enterprise privacy platforms are headquartered in the US and process data under US jurisdiction. After Schrems II, this creates legal uncertainty for European organizations managing sensitive personal data.
6–12 month implementations
Enterprise platforms often require dedicated implementation teams, external consultants, and months of configuration before you see any value. Time you spend implementing is time you're not compliant.
Modular pricing, expanding costs
Need DPIA automation? That's a module. Vendor risk management? Another module. Incident management? Add-on. Per-user pricing means every new team member increases your spend.
Six-figure contracts
Enterprise privacy platforms are priced for Fortune 500 budgets. Mid-market organizations end up paying for ESG modules, ethics hotlines, and cookie consent tools they never asked for.
AI as a black box
Many platforms market "AI-powered" features without clarity on where data is processed, whether outputs are reviewed, or if customer data trains their models. For compliance tools, that opacity is a risk , not a feature.
200 integrations, most unused
Long integration lists look impressive in RFPs but create maintenance overhead. Most organizations use fewer than 10 , and the ones that matter for privacy workflows are often the weakest.
The Multi-Entity Privacy Platform Buyer's Guide
Evaluating Kertos alternatives? This 12-page guide gives you the framework to compare platforms based on what actually matters for group-wide privacy management , not vendor marketing.
What's inside:
- 1. The 7 capabilities every multi-entity privacy platform must have , and how Kertos, OneTrust, and Priverion stack up across each one
- 2. A total cost of ownership worksheet , including hidden per-user, per-module, and integration costs most vendors won't surface until the contract stage
- 3. Data sovereignty decision matrix , how to evaluate Swiss, EU, and US hosting in a post-Schrems II landscape, with specific questions for vendor due diligence
- 4. Real migration timelines from teams that switched , including how Aircraft manufacturer achieved full operational compliance in weeks, not months
Free PDF. No demo required. We'll send it to your inbox.
Stop managing privacy in spreadsheets
See what group-wide privacy management looks like when it actually works
In 30 minutes, we'll walk through how organizations like Aircraft manufacturer cut compliance admin time by 60% , and how your team can get operational in weeks, not months. No sales pitch. Just a live look at the platform with someone who understands multi-entity privacy programs.
Weeks, not months
Average time to go live , based on customer onboarding data
No per-user pricing
Predictable costs based on entities and org size
100% Swiss-hosted
All data processing within Swiss infrastructure
No commitment required. We'll show you the platform with your use case in mind.
