NIS2 Directive Tracker — Updated June 2025

NIS2 Transposition Status by Country: Where Every EU Member State Stands in 2025

Updated 2026-05-18
Key Takeaways: Priverion is a Swiss-hosted GRC platform that tracks NIS2 transposition status across all 27 EU member states with monthly regulatory updates.

The NIS2 Directive deadline was October 17, 2024. Yet as of June 2025, only a handful of the 27 member states have fully transposed it into national law. If your organization operates across multiple EU jurisdictions, the compliance landscape is fragmented, confusing, and moving fast. This page tracks it all — updated monthly.

27

EU member states tracked

160,000+

entities affected across the EU

European Commission estimate, 2023

24h

incident reporting window

NIS2 Directive, Article 23

See the full country-by-country tracker

No signup required. Bookmark this page — we update it monthly.

Trusted by 50+ privacy teams across 14 countries
Healthcare
Aviation
Energy
Legal
Technology
Zurzach logo
AXA logo
Open Medical logo
Glencore logo
Pilatus logo
Liferay logo
CareerFairy logo
Voicepoint logo
Kellerhals Carrard logo
Aclaris logo
Avantec logo
Diakonie Bethanien logo
Liferay logo
CareerFairy logo
Zurzach logo
Voicepoint logo
Open Medical logo
Kellerhals Carrard logo
AXA logo
Aclaris logo
Avantec logo
Diakonie Bethanien logo
NIS2 Country-by-Country Tracker

NIS2 Transposition Tracker: All 27 EU Member States

Each card below reflects the current NIS2 implementation status, national implementing law, competent authority, and any noteworthy deviations from the directive's minimum requirements. Tracking the NIS2 transposition status by country is essential for organizations operating across multiple EU jurisdictions — what applies in Belgium may differ significantly from what's required in Germany. Updated monthly by Priverion's regulatory intelligence team.

Fully Transposed

Austria

NISG 2024 — enacted December 2024

Austria enacted its updated Network and Information Systems Security Act (NISG 2024) in late 2024. The law expands the scope of regulated entities significantly and designates existing sector-specific authorities alongside the national CERT. Austria's approach adds stricter requirements for critical infrastructure operators in the energy and transport sectors beyond the directive's baseline.

Competent Authority: BMI / GovCERT Austria

Key Deviation: Stricter requirements for energy and transport critical infrastructure

Source: Austrian Federal Law Gazette, December 2024 — Last updated: June 2025

Fully Transposed

Belgium

Loi NIS2 — enacted April 2024

Among the first EU member states to complete transposition. Belgium's law closely mirrors the directive but expands the definition of essential entities to include certain regional government bodies. The Centre for Cybersecurity Belgium (CCB) serves as the competent national authority with enforcement powers.

Competent Authority: Centre for Cybersecurity Belgium (CCB)

Key Deviation: Expanded scope to include regional government entities

Source: Belgian Official Gazette, April 2024 — Last updated: June 2025

No Public Progress

Bulgaria

No draft published — no estimated timeline

Bulgaria has not published draft transposition legislation. The State Agency for Electronic Government is expected to play a role in implementation, but no formal legislative process has commenced. The European Commission has initiated infringement proceedings. Organizations operating in Bulgaria should align with the directive's baseline requirements while monitoring developments.

Competent Authority: State Agency for Electronic Government (expected)

Key Deviation: Unknown — no draft available

Source: European Commission infringement proceedings tracker — Last updated: June 2025

Fully Transposed

Croatia

Zakon o kibernetičkoj sigurnosti — enacted October 2024

Croatia met the October 17, 2024 deadline with its Cybersecurity Act. The law aligns closely with NIS2 requirements and designates the National Council for Cybersecurity as the coordinating body. Incident reporting follows the directive's 24-hour early warning and 72-hour notification framework without significant deviations.

Competent Authority: CERT.hr / National Council for Cybersecurity

Key Deviation: Minimal — closely follows directive baseline

Source: Croatian Official Gazette, October 2024 — Last updated: June 2025

Draft Published

Cyprus

Draft cybersecurity bill — under ministerial review

Cyprus has published a draft cybersecurity bill that is currently under ministerial review. The Digital Security Authority (DSA) is expected to serve as the competent national authority. The draft closely follows the directive's structure but is still subject to amendments before parliamentary submission. Timeline for enactment remains uncertain.

Competent Authority: Digital Security Authority (DSA, expected)

Key Deviation: Still under review — potential amendments pending

Source: Cyprus government consultation documents, 2024 — Last updated: June 2025

Fully Transposed

Czech Republic

Zákon o kybernetické bezpečnosti (amended) — enacted October 2024

The Czech Republic amended its existing Cybersecurity Act to incorporate NIS2 requirements, meeting the October deadline. NUKIB (National Cyber and Information Security Agency) retains its role as the central authority with expanded powers. The Czech approach adds mandatory cybersecurity audits for essential entities every two years — a requirement that goes beyond the directive.

Competent Authority: NUKIB (National Cyber and Information Security Agency)

Key Deviation: Mandatory biennial cybersecurity audits for essential entities

Source: Czech Collection of Laws, October 2024 — Last updated: June 2025

Partially Transposed

Denmark

Multiple sector-specific acts — phased implementation ongoing

Denmark has taken a sector-by-sector approach to NIS2 transposition, with separate legislative instruments for different sectors. The Centre for Cyber Security (CFCS) coordinates across sectors. While some sector legislation is enacted, others remain in parliamentary process. This decentralized approach means compliance requirements may vary by sector and timeline.

Competent Authority: CFCS (Centre for Cyber Security) with sector regulators

Key Deviation: Sector-by-sector transposition rather than single unified law

Source: Danish Ministry of Defence publications, 2024 — Last updated: June 2025

Draft Published

Estonia

Küberturvalisuse seaduse muutmine — draft published, parliamentary review

Estonia, despite its reputation as a digital leader, missed the October 2024 deadline but has published comprehensive draft amendments to its Cybersecurity Act. The Information System Authority (RIA) will continue as the primary authority. Estonia's draft includes provisions for government digital services that extend scope beyond the directive's baseline.

Competent Authority: RIA (Information System Authority)

Key Deviation: Extended scope covering government digital services

Source: Estonian Ministry of Economic Affairs, 2024 — Last updated: June 2025

Partially Transposed

Finland

Kyberturvallisuuslaki — enacted January 2025

Finland enacted its Cybersecurity Act in early 2025, slightly past the deadline. The law follows the directive closely and designates Traficom as the primary competent authority. Secondary implementing regulations are still being finalized, particularly around sector-specific incident reporting thresholds and registration timelines for important entities.

Competent Authority: Traficom (Finnish Transport and Communications Agency)

Key Deviation: Secondary regulations for incident thresholds still pending

Source: Finnish Government legislative tracker, January 2025 — Last updated: June 2025

In Legislative Process

France

Projet de loi NIS2 — parliamentary review, expected H1 2025

France's ANSSI has been actively preparing for NIS2 since 2023, but formal legislative transposition has been delayed by political instability. The draft law is currently under parliamentary review. France is expected to significantly expand the number of regulated entities from approximately 500 under NIS1 to an estimated 15,000+ under NIS2. ANSSI's enforcement approach emphasizes proportionality and support for newly in-scope organizations.

Competent Authority: ANSSI (Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d'information)

Key Deviation: Significant scope expansion; proportionality-based enforcement

Source: ANSSI public statements, December 2024 — Last updated: June 2025

Draft Published

Germany

NIS2-Umsetzungsgesetz (NIS2UmsuCG) — expected 2025

Germany's NIS2 transposition has been delayed by the collapse of the governing coalition in late 2024. The draft NIS2UmsuCG significantly expands the number of entities in scope — estimated at 29,000+ organizations — and introduces stricter management liability provisions. BSI (Federal Office for Information Security) will serve as the central authority with expanded enforcement powers.

Competent Authority: BSI (Federal Office for Information Security)

Key Deviation: Expanded scope to ~29,000 entities; stricter management liability

Source: BMI draft legislation, July 2024 — Last updated: June 2025

Draft Published

Greece

Draft cybersecurity law — under parliamentary committee review

Greece has published draft legislation transposing NIS2, currently under review by the relevant parliamentary committee. The National Cybersecurity Authority, established in 2022, is designated as the competent authority. The draft includes specific provisions for the maritime and tourism sectors reflecting Greece's economic priorities, extending requirements slightly beyond the directive baseline for these industries.

Competent Authority: National Cybersecurity Authority (NCA Greece)

Key Deviation: Additional requirements for maritime and tourism sectors

Source: Greek Ministry of Digital Governance, 2024 — Last updated: June 2025

Fully Transposed

Hungary

Government Decree 418/2024 — enacted October 2024

Hungary transposed NIS2 through a government decree rather than a standalone parliamentary act, allowing faster implementation. The National Directorate General for Cyber Defence serves as the primary authority. Hungary's approach includes additional registration requirements for entities that go slightly beyond the directive's minimum.

Competent Authority: National Directorate General for Cyber Defence

Key Deviation: Additional entity registration requirements

Source: Hungarian Official Gazette, October 2024 — Last updated: June 2025

No Public Progress

Ireland

No draft published — expected 2025

Despite hosting the European headquarters of many major technology companies, Ireland has not yet published a draft transposition law. The NCSC Ireland is expected to serve as the competent authority. Given Ireland's significance as a data processing hub, the eventual national law could have outsized impact on technology and cloud service providers operating across Europe. The European Commission has opened infringement proceedings.

Competent Authority: NCSC Ireland (expected)

Key Deviation: Unknown — significant impact expected for tech sector

Source: European Commission infringement proceedings, November 2024 — Last updated: June 2025

In Legislative Process

Italy

Decreto Legislativo NIS2 — enacted October 2024, implementation ongoing

Italy published its transposition decree in October 2024, technically meeting the deadline. However, key implementing provisions — including entity registration requirements and detailed incident reporting procedures — are still being finalized through secondary legislation. ACN (National Cybersecurity Agency) is leading implementation with phased compliance milestones through 2025. Italy's approach includes gold-plating in supply chain risk management requirements.

Competent Authority: ACN (Agenzia per la Cybersicurezza Nazionale)

Key Deviation: Stricter supply chain risk management; phased implementation

Source: Italian Official Gazette, October 2024 — Last updated: June 2025

Fully Transposed

Latvia

Kiberdrošības likums — enacted September 2024

Latvia was one of the early transposers, enacting its Cybersecurity Act ahead of the October 2024 deadline. CERT.LV serves as the national CSIRT with expanded coordination responsibilities. Latvia's law closely follows the directive with minimal deviations, providing a clear compliance baseline for entities operating in the Baltics.

Competent Authority: CERT.LV / Ministry of Defence

Key Deviation: Minimal — closely follows directive baseline

Source: Latvian Official Gazette, September 2024 — Last updated: June 2025

Fully Transposed

Lithuania

Kibernetinio saugumo įstatymas (amended) — enacted October 2024

Lithuania amended its existing Cybersecurity Law to meet the NIS2 deadline. The National Cyber Security Centre (NKSC) retains its primary role. Lithuania's approach adds a national cybersecurity certification scheme for critical infrastructure suppliers, going beyond the directive's baseline and reflecting the country's focus on supply chain resilience given its geopolitical position.

Competent Authority: NKSC (National Cyber Security Centre)

Key Deviation: National supplier certification scheme for critical infrastructure

Source: Lithuanian Seimas records, October 2024 — Last updated: June 2025

Draft Published

Luxembourg

Projet de loi NIS2 — draft published, parliamentary review

Luxembourg has published its draft NIS2 transposition law, currently in parliamentary review. Given Luxembourg's role as a major financial services hub, the draft includes specific provisions coordinating NIS2 compliance with existing DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act) requirements. The ILR and CSSF are expected to share competent authority responsibilities across sectors.

Competent Authority: ILR / CSSF (shared, sector-dependent)

Key Deviation: Coordinated NIS2-DORA compliance framework for financial sector

Source: Luxembourg Chamber of Deputies records, 2024 — Last updated: June 2025

No Public Progress

Malta

No draft published — expected 2025

Malta has not yet published draft transposition legislation. The Malta Information Technology Agency (MITA) and the Critical Infrastructure Protection Directorate are expected to play roles in implementation. Given Malta's growing igaming and fintech sectors, both of which may fall within NIS2 scope, timely transposition is commercially significant. The European Commission has opened infringement proceedings.

Competent Authority: MITA / Critical Infrastructure Protection Directorate (expected)

Key Deviation: Unknown — potential impact on igaming and fintech sectors

Source: European Commission infringement proceedings tracker — Last updated: June 2025

Partially Transposed

Netherlands

Cyberbeveiligingswet (Cbw) — draft submitted, expected H1 2025

The Netherlands published its draft Cybersecurity Act (Cbw) to replace the existing Wbni, but parliamentary approval remains pending. The Dutch approach designates sector-specific regulators as competent authorities rather than a single central body — meaning different regulators for energy, healthcare, transport, and digital infrastructure. This decentralized model adds complexity for multi-sector organizations operating in the Netherlands.

Competent Authority: Sector-specific regulators (decentralized model)

Key Deviation: Decentralized enforcement across sector regulators

Source: Dutch Ministry of Justice consultation, September 2024 — Last updated: June 2025

Draft Published

Poland

Nowelizacja ustawy o KSC — draft published, parliamentary process

Poland has published draft amendments to its National Cybersecurity System Act (ustawa o KSC) but parliamentary passage has been delayed. The draft significantly expands the entities in scope and introduces a new national cybersecurity incident classification system. NASK and sector-specific CSIRTs will share responsibilities. Poland's approach includes enhanced requirements for public administration entities.

Competent Authority: NASK / sector CSIRTs

Key Deviation: New incident classification system; expanded public administration scope

Source: Polish Ministry of Digital Affairs, 2024 — Last updated: June 2025

No Public Progress

Portugal

No draft published — no estimated timeline

Portugal is among the member states with no publicly available draft legislation for NIS2 transposition. The National Cybersecurity Centre (CNCS) is expected to serve as the competent authority, but no formal timeline for legislative action has been communicated. Organizations operating in Portugal should monitor developments closely and consider aligning with the directive's baseline requirements in the interim.

Competent Authority: CNCS (expected)

Key Deviation: Unknown — no draft available

Source: European Commission infringement proceedings tracker — Last updated: June 2025

Draft Published

Romania

Proiect de lege NIS2 — draft under governmental review

Romania has published a draft NIS2 transposition law currently under governmental review before parliamentary submission. DNSC (National Cyber Security Directorate) is designated as the competent authority. The draft includes provisions for a national cybersecurity exercises program and mandatory risk assessments for entities operating critical infrastructure, extending slightly beyond the directive's baseline.

Competent Authority: DNSC (National Cyber Security Directorate)

Key Deviation: Mandatory national cybersecurity exercises program

Source: Romanian government legislative portal, 2024 — Last updated: June 2025

Draft Published

Slovakia

Zákon o kybernetickej bezpečnosti (amendment) — draft published

Slovakia has published draft amendments to its Cybersecurity Act, currently working through the legislative process. The National Security Authority (NBU) is designated as the central competent authority. Slovakia's draft follows the directive closely but includes an accelerated entity registration timeline requiring compliance within 90 days of the law's enactment.

Competent Authority: NBU (National Security Authority)

Key Deviation: Accelerated 90-day entity registration requirement

Source: Slovak Ministry of Investment, Regionalism and Informatization, 2024 — Last updated: June 2025

Partially Transposed

Slovenia

Zakon o informacijski varnosti (ZInfV-1) — enacted late 2024, secondary measures pending

Slovenia enacted its updated Information Security Act in late 2024, but secondary implementing measures are still being developed. The Office of the Government of the Republic of Slovenia for Information Security (URSIV) serves as the coordinating body. The law covers the core NIS2 requirements but defers several operational details to bylaws expected in 2025.

Competent Authority: URSIV / SI-CERT

Key Deviation: Phased implementation with secondary measures pending

Source: Slovenian Official Gazette, 2024 — Last updated: June 2025

Draft Published

Spain

Anteproyecto de Ley NIS2 — draft published, Council of State review

Spain has published its draft NIS2 transposition law (anteproyecto), which is undergoing review by the Council of State before parliamentary submission. CCN-CERT and INCIBE share competent authority responsibilities depending on entity type. Spain's draft introduces a national compliance certification scheme and includes specific provisions for the tourism and hospitality sectors.

Competent Authority: CCN-CERT / INCIBE (shared)

Key Deviation: National compliance certification; tourism sector provisions

Source: Spanish Ministry of Digital Transformation, 2024 — Last updated: June 2025

Partially Transposed

Sweden

Cybersäkerhetslag — enacted early 2025, secondary regulations in progress

Sweden enacted its Cybersecurity Act in early 2025 after a thorough governmental inquiry. MSB (Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency) serves as the central coordinating authority, with sector regulators handling enforcement. Secondary regulations specifying detailed compliance requirements for different entity categories are still being finalized, with expected completion by mid-2025.

Competent Authority: MSB (Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency) with sector regulators

Key Deviation: Sector-regulator enforcement model; secondary regulations pending

Source: Swedish Government Official Reports, 2024 — Last updated: June 2025

200+

Hours saved on compliance documentation

Medtec saved 200+ hours preparing for ISO 27001 certification by replacing manual documentation with automated compliance workflows — within their first year on Priverion.

60%

Less compliance admin time

Aircraft manufacturer reduced compliance admin time by 60% in their first 6 months — with predictable pricing based on entities, not per-user or per-module expansion traps.

3 mo

Ahead of schedule on ISO 27001

Medtec completed ISO 27001 preparation three months ahead of their projected timeline using Priverion's audit-ready evidence packages and automated documentation.

Comparison

Why mid-market teams switch from OneTrust to Priverion

Enterprise privacy platforms were built for Fortune 500 budgets and complexity. If you're managing compliance across 5–50 subsidiaries, you need something different — not something smaller.

Typical enterprise platform

What you get with OneTrust

Per-module, per-user pricing

Costs escalate unpredictably as you add subsidiaries, users, or features. Budget conversations happen quarterly, not annually.

US-headquartered, global hosting

Data may be processed in US or other non-European jurisdictions. Post-Schrems II, this creates ongoing legal exposure for cross-border transfers.

200+ integrations, shallow depth

Impressive connector count, but many require custom configuration and ongoing maintenance that strains mid-market IT teams.

Built for Fortune 500 buyers

Feature-rich, but overwhelming for teams under 20. DPOs report spending weeks in onboarding just to configure modules they don't need.

Months-long implementation

Enterprise deployments routinely take 6–12 months before teams see value. Professional services costs add up fast.

Built for multi-entity mid-market

What you get with Priverion

Predictable pricing by company count

No per-user seats, no per-module upsells. One platform, all capabilities included. Your CFO gets a number that doesn't change mid-year.

Swiss-built, Swiss-hosted — guaranteed

All data processed within Swiss infrastructure. European data residency is not a configuration option — it's

About this page — references, definitions, and FAQs

Key Takeaways — NIS2 Transposition Status Tracker

The NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) required all 27 EU member states to transpose its cybersecurity requirements into national law by October 17, 2024. As of mid-2025, only a small number of countries have fully completed transposition. The European Commission has initiated infringement proceedings against 23 member states. This tracker monitors each country's legislative progress, competent authorities, and deviations from the directive's baseline — updated monthly by Priverion's regulatory intelligence team.

What is the NIS2 Directive?

NIS2 Directive (formally Directive (EU) 2022/2555) is the European Union's revised framework for achieving a high common level of cybersecurity across all member states. It replaced the original NIS Directive (2016/1148) and was published in the Official Journal of the European Union on December 27, 2022. NIS2 significantly expands the scope of regulated sectors from 7 to 18, introduces size-based thresholds for entity classification, and mandates stricter incident reporting timelines and management-body accountability. Source: EUR-Lex — Directive (EU) 2022/2555

What is transposition in EU law?

Transposition is the process by which EU member states incorporate the provisions of an EU directive into their national legal frameworks. Unlike EU regulations, which are directly applicable, directives require each member state to adopt national legislation that achieves the directive's objectives while allowing flexibility in implementation methods. Source: EUR-Lex — Types of EU law

What was the NIS2 transposition deadline?

Article 41 of the NIS2 Directive set October 17, 2024 as the deadline for all 27 EU member states to adopt and publish the national measures necessary to comply with the directive. Member states were also required to apply those measures from October 18, 2024. As of November 2024, the European Commission sent letters of formal notice to 23 member states that had not notified full transposition. Source: EUR-Lex — NIS2 Directive, Article 41

How many entities are affected by NIS2?

According to the European Commission's 2023 impact assessment, over 160,000 entities across the EU fall within the expanded scope of NIS2. The directive covers 18 sectors, including energy, transport, banking, health, drinking water, digital infrastructure, ICT service management, public administration, and space. ENISA's 2024 NIS Investments report noted that the median cybersecurity budget for entities in scope of NIS2 was approximately €1.4 million, representing about 9% of total IT spending. Source: ENISA — NIS Investments Report 2024

What are the NIS2 incident reporting requirements?

NIS2 Article 23 establishes a multi-stage incident reporting framework: entities must issue an early warning within 24 hours of becoming aware of a significant incident, followed by a full incident notification within 72 hours, and a final report within one month. ENISA coordinates cross-border incident response through the EU-CyCLONe network. According to ENISA's Threat Landscape 2024 report, ransomware and DDoS attacks remained the top two threat categories affecting NIS-regulated sectors. Source: ENISA — Threat Landscape 2024

What happens if a member state fails to transpose NIS2 on time?

Under Article 258 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the European Commission may initiate infringement proceedings against member states that fail to transpose directives by the deadline. In November 2024, the Commission sent formal letters of notice to 23 of the 27 member states for failing to notify complete transposition of NIS2. If non-compliance persists, the Commission may refer cases to the Court of Justice of the European Union, which can impose financial penalties. Source: EUR-Lex — NIS2 Directive

Does NIS2 apply to non-EU companies?

Yes. NIS2 has extraterritorial reach. Article 26 requires non-EU entities that provide services within the EU and fall within scope to designate a representative in one of the member states where they operate. This mirrors the representative requirement under GDPR Article 27. Failure to designate a representative does not exempt the entity from NIS2 obligations. Source: EUR-Lex — NIS2 Directive, Article 26

What is the difference between essential and important entities under NIS2?

NIS2 classifies entities into two categories based on sector and size. Essential entities include operators in sectors such as energy, transport, banking, health, drinking water, digital infrastructure, and public administration. Important entities cover sectors like postal services, waste management, chemicals, food production, and manufacturing. Both categories must comply with the same cybersecurity risk management and incident reporting obligations (Articles 21 and 23). However, essential entities are subject to proactive, ex-ante supervision — including regular audits and on-site inspections — while important entities face reactive, ex-post supervision triggered by evidence of non-compliance. Source: EUR-Lex — NIS2 Directive, Articles 32–33

NIS2 Transposition Statistics and Timeline

  • October 17, 2024 — Transposition deadline for all 27 EU member states (NIS2 Article 41)
  • November 2024 — European Commission sends letters of formal notice to 23 member states for non-transposition
  • 160,000+ entities estimated in scope across the EU (European Commission, 2023)
  • 18 sectors covered under NIS2, up from 7 under the original NIS Directive
  • 24 hours — early warning deadline for significant incidents (NIS2 Article 23)
  • 72 hours — full incident notification deadline (NIS2 Article 23)
  • €10 million or 2% of global turnover — maximum administrative fine for essential entities (NIS2 Article 34)
  • €7 million or 1.4% of global turnover — maximum administrative fine for important entities (NIS2 Article 34)

NIS2 vs. Original NIS Directive — Comparison

AspectNIS Directive (2016/1148)NIS2 Directive (2022/2555)
Sectors in scope7 sectors18 sectors
Entity classificationOperators of Essential Services (OES) + Digital Service Providers (DSP)Essential entities + Important entities (size-based thresholds)
Incident reportingWithout undue delay24h early warning, 72h notification, 1-month final report
Maximum finesSet by member states (varied widely)€10M / 2% turnover (essential); €7M / 1.4% turnover (important)
Management accountabilityNot explicitly addressedManagement bodies must approve and oversee cybersecurity measures (Article 20)
Supply chain securityLimited provisionsMandatory supply chain risk assessments (Article 21(2)(d))
Supervision modelVaried by member stateEx-ante for essential; ex-post for important entities
Cross-border coordinationCooperation Group + CSIRTs NetworkEnhanced: EU-CyCLONe + peer reviews + coordinated vulnerability disclosure

Authoritative Sources and References