EU AI Act Compliance

Complete Your Article 27 FRIA in Days, Not Months , Without Adding Another Tool

Updated 2026-05-18
Key Takeaways: Priverion is a Swiss-hosted GRC platform that lets deployers run structured Article 27 Fundamental Rights Impact Assessments alongside DPIAs and TIAs.

Run structured, audit-ready Fundamental Rights Impact Assessments inside the platform where you already manage DPIAs and TIAs.

Book a Free 30-Minute Demo

See the FRIA workflow live. No commitment required.

ISO 27001 Certified SOC 2 Type II GDPR Compliant Swiss Data Hosting

"Priverion cut our compliance admin time by 60% in the first six months. We finally have group-wide visibility across all subsidiaries without chasing spreadsheets."

Head of Data Protection, Aircraft manufacturer

200+ hours saved per org 100% ROPA recertification at AXA 50+ entities managed
Trusted by 50+ privacy teams across 14 countries
Healthcare
Aviation
Energy
Legal
Technology
Zurzach logo
AXA logo
Open Medical logo
Glencore logo
Pilatus logo
Liferay logo
CareerFairy logo
Voicepoint logo
Kellerhals Carrard logo
Aclaris logo
Avantec logo
Diakonie Bethanien logo
Liferay logo
CareerFairy logo
Zurzach logo
Voicepoint logo
Open Medical logo
Kellerhals Carrard logo
AXA logo
Aclaris logo
Avantec logo
Diakonie Bethanien logo
How Priverion Handles FRIA

Run Your Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment in the Same Platform Where You Manage DPIAs, TIAs, and ROPA

Six capabilities designed for multi-entity organizations that need structured, auditable FRIA workflows , not another standalone tool.

Structured FRIA Workflow Aligned to Article 27

A guided, step-by-step assessment template maps directly to Article 27 requirements. Every mandatory element , deployer processes, affected groups, specific risks to fundamental rights, human oversight measures, escalation plans , is captured in structured fields, not free-text chaos.

Result: Complete, consistent assessments across every entity , every time.

Based on EU AI Act Article 27 mandatory elements mapping

Reuse Intelligence from Existing DPIAs and TIAs

Already conducted a DPIA or TIA for an AI-related processing activity? Relevant data , processing purposes, data categories, risk ratings, safeguards , can be referenced or linked within the FRIA. No duplicate data entry. No contradictory documentation. One source of truth.

Result: Compounding value from your existing compliance work in Priverion.

Integrated platform capability , available to all Priverion customers

Multi-Entity Rollout with Centralized Oversight

Deploy the FRIA workflow across all group entities from a single admin view. Assign responsibility to local DPOs or AI governance leads. Track completion status, flag overdue assessments, and generate group-level reporting , exactly the way you already manage ROPA recertification.

Result: Group-wide visibility without chasing subsidiaries.

Mirrors multi-entity ROPA workflow used by customers like Aircraft manufacturer

Automated Recertification and Review Cycles

The EU AI Act requires FRIAs to be updated when conditions change. Set recertification schedules, trigger reassessments when an AI system is updated or redeployed, and maintain a full version history. Every change is timestamped and attributable , no stale assessments hiding in shared drives.

Result: Recertification compliance on autopilot.

AXA achieved 100% ROPA recertification rate using the same automation engine

Audit-Ready Documentation and Export

Generate PDF or structured exports of any FRIA for submission to supervisory authorities, internal audit committees, or AI governance boards. Every assessment carries a complete audit trail , who created it, who reviewed it, who approved it, and when. Minutes to produce, not weeks.

Result: 100% audit trail coverage with zero documentation gaps.

Medtec saved 200+ hours in ISO 27001 prep using Priverion's export workflows

Consultation Workflow for Affected Groups

Article 27 requires deployers to consult affected groups or their representatives where appropriate. Document who was consulted, what input was received, and how it was incorporated into the assessment. This is the element most organizations will overlook , and the one regulators will scrutinize first.

Result: Defensible consultation records that survive regulatory scrutiny.

Based on EU AI Act Article 27(1)(c) consultation requirements

Book a Demo to See These in Action

200+

Hours saved on compliance documentation

Medtec saved 200+ hours preparing for ISO 27001 certification using Priverion's automated documentation workflows , time previously spent compiling evidence manually across departments.

60%

Lower cost vs. legacy enterprise platforms

Based on Priverion's per-company pricing model vs. per-user, per-module enterprise pricing structures. No expansion traps , predictable costs as your group grows.

3 mo

Ahead of schedule on ISO 27001 readiness

Medtec accelerated their ISO 27001 preparation by three months using Priverion's audit-ready evidence packages and automated compliance documentation.

Based on customer-reported outcomes, Q1 2025

Priverion vs. OneTrust

Why mid-market companies are making the switch

OneTrust serves Fortune 500 organizations with broader GRC scope and dedicated privacy teams. Priverion was built for organizations that need enterprise-grade compliance without the enterprise overhead.

With Priverion

Swiss data sovereignty, guaranteed

All data processed and stored exclusively within Swiss infrastructure. In a post-Schrems II world, this isn't a preference . it's a legal safeguard for cross-border transfers. No US CLOUD Act applicability (18 U.S.C. §2713), no data routing through non-EU jurisdictions.

Operational in weeks, not quarters

A clean, intuitive interface that DPOs and business unit owners actually use , without a six-figure implementation project or a dedicated admin team to keep things running.

Predictable pricing that scales with you

Priced by number of companies and organizational size , not per-user or per-module. No surprise invoices when you add a subsidiary or onboard a new team member.

One platform for your entire privacy program

ROPA, DPIAs, vendor assessments, DSR handling, incident management, AI governance , all in a single platform with group-wide visibility across every entity and jurisdiction.

European data residency as standard

Not an add-on tier. Not a contractual workaround. Swiss hosting and European data residency are the default, backed by one of the strongest privacy legal frameworks in the world.

Common OneTrust frustrations

US-hosted, US-headquartered

Subject to US CLOUD Act and FISA 702. European data residency options exist but require specific contractual arrangements and add-on tiers , and the parent entity remains under US jurisdiction.

Implementation measured in months

Complex configuration, steep learning curve, and feature bloat that overwhelms mid-market teams. Many organizations report needing dedicated admins or external consultants just to maintain the platform.

Per-module pricing adds up fast

Need vendor risk management? That's another module. DPIA automation? Another line item. Per-user charges mean costs grow every time your team does. Mid-market organizations often end up paying enterprise prices for capabilities they use partially.

Built for everything, optimized for less

OneTrust covers ESG, ethics, cookie consent, and more , a massive surface area. If your core need is privacy program management across multiple entities, the surrounding complexity becomes overhead, not value.

Data residency as an upsell

European hosting is available , but often requires negotiation, contract amendments, or premium tiers. For organizations where data residency is non-negotiable, it should be the starting point, not an add-on conversation.

60% reduction in compliance admin time

Aircraft manufacturer switched from spreadsheet-based compliance to automated recertification across multiple subsidiaries , and their DPO got back to strategic work.

Aircraft manufacturer , first 6 months after implementation

Honest note: We don't cover ESG, ethics hotlines, or cookie consent. If you need those, OneTrust might be the right fit. Our strength is group-wide privacy program management , and we go deeper there than anyone.

Free Guide . PDF Download

The DPO's Practical Guide to Fundamental Rights Impact Assessments Under the EU AI Act

Most organizations deploying high-risk AI systems know they need an FRIA , but few have a repeatable process that satisfies Article 27 requirements. This 18-page guide bridges the gap between legal text and operational reality.

What you'll get:

  • A step-by-step FRIA methodology mapped directly to Article 27 requirements , including which high-risk AI categories trigger mandatory assessments
  • Ready-to-use templates for documenting proportionality analysis, affected group identification, and mitigation measures that supervisory authorities expect to see
  • How to connect your existing DPIA workflow to FRIA obligations , avoiding duplicate work across GDPR and AI Act compliance
  • A multi-entity coordination checklist for organizations running high-risk AI systems across subsidiaries in different EU member states

Written by privacy practitioners who've implemented FRIAs at multi-subsidiary organizations , not by lawyers writing for other lawyers.

Download your copy

Get the guide that turns Article 27 obligations into a clear, repeatable process for your privacy team.

Free PDF. No demo required. We'll send it to your inbox.

Common Questions

What DPOs and Compliance Leads Ask Before Getting Started

Straight answers , no sales spin.

Who actually needs to conduct a Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment?

Article 27 of the EU AI Act requires deployers of high-risk AI systems to assess the impact on fundamental rights before putting the system into use. This applies to organizations that deploy , not just develop , high-risk AI in areas like employment, creditworthiness, law enforcement, and public services. If your organization uses AI systems classified as high-risk under Annex III, you likely need an FRIA.

How is an FRIA different from a DPIA?

A DPIA under GDPR focuses on data protection risks to individuals from a specific processing activity. An FRIA under the EU AI Act assesses broader fundamental rights impacts , non-discrimination, freedom of expression, human dignity, access to justice , caused by deploying high-risk AI systems. There's overlap, especially on data protection, but the FRIA has a wider scope. Priverion lets you reference existing DPIA data within your FRIA so you're not duplicating work.

Can Priverion scale to 50+ entities across different jurisdictions?

Yes. Multi-entity, multi-jurisdiction management is our core design principle , not an afterthought. You can deploy FRIA workflows across all group entities from a central admin view, assign local owners, track completion status, and generate group-level reporting. This is the same architecture customers like Aircraft manufacturer use for ROPA recertification across their subsidiaries.

Is AI used in the FRIA process? Is that safe for compliance?

Priverion offers AI-assisted drafting and risk scoring to accelerate FRIA completion , but every AI output is reviewed by a human before it becomes a compliance record. All data is processed within Swiss infrastructure. No customer data is used for model training. AI assists your team's decisions; it never replaces them.

We're already using OneTrust. How hard is it to switch?

Most mid-market organizations are operational in Priverion within weeks, not months. We support structured data migration from existing tools and provide hands-on onboarding. The typical switching pain point isn't technical . it's the relief of finally having a platform that matches your actual complexity level instead of overwhelming you with features built for Fortune 500 use cases.

What if we need cookie consent or ESG modules too?

We don't cover those , and we're upfront about it. Priverion is purpose-built for privacy program management: ROPA, DPIAs, TIAs, FRIAs, vendor risk, DSR handling, incident management, and AI governance. If you need ESG, ethics hotlines, or cookie consent, you'll need a separate solution for those. Our strength is going deeper on group-wide privacy management than any platform that tries to cover everything.

Stop managing privacy in spreadsheets.
Start managing it for real.

Aircraft manufacturer cut compliance admin time by 60% in six months. AXA hit 100% ROPA recertification , fully automated. Medtec saved 200+ hours preparing for ISO 27001.

In 30 minutes, we'll show you exactly how group-wide privacy management works when it's built for multi-entity complexity , with Swiss data sovereignty, AI-assisted workflows, and pricing that doesn't punish you for growing.

Book a Free 30-Minute Demo

No sales pitch. No 12-month commitment required. Just a clear look at what changes.

Weeks

Time to go live , not months

50+

Entities managed in a single platform

100%

Swiss-hosted data sovereignty

About this page — references, definitions, and FAQs

Key Takeaways — Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment Under the EU AI Act

Article 27 of the EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) requires deployers of high-risk AI systems to conduct a Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA) before putting those systems into use. The obligation takes effect on 2 August 2026 and applies to public-sector bodies, private operators providing public services, and deployers of Annex III high-risk systems such as credit scoring and insurance pricing. Priverion provides a structured, Swiss-hosted workflow that maps directly to Article 27 mandatory elements — deployer processes, affected groups, specific fundamental-rights risks, human oversight measures, and consultation records — inside the same platform used for DPIAs, TIAs, and ROPA management.

Definitions

What is a Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA)?

A Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA) is a structured evaluation mandated by Article 27 of the EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) that requires deployers of high-risk AI systems to assess the potential impact on fundamental rights — including non-discrimination, privacy, human dignity, and access to essential services — before the system is put into use.

What is a high-risk AI system under the EU AI Act?

A high-risk AI system is an AI system listed in Annex III of the EU AI Act or embedded in a product covered by Annex I Union harmonisation legislation. Categories include biometric identification, critical infrastructure management, education and vocational training, employment and worker management, access to essential private and public services (including credit scoring and insurance), law enforcement, migration and border control, and administration of justice. See EU AI Act Annex III for the full list.

What is a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)?

A Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) is required under Article 35 of the GDPR when processing is likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons. While a DPIA focuses on data protection risks, an FRIA covers a broader set of fundamental rights.

Statistics and Context

According to the IAPP-EY 2023 Privacy Governance Report, 60% of organizations reported that their privacy teams are now also responsible for AI governance. The European Commission's impact assessment for the AI Act estimated that compliance costs for high-risk AI systems range from €6,000 to €7,000 per system for conformity assessments, with ongoing monitoring adding further expense. A 2024 ENISA report on AI cybersecurity emphasized that organizations deploying AI in critical sectors must integrate fundamental-rights assessments into their broader risk management frameworks.

The EDPB Guidelines 07/2024 on the interplay between GDPR and the AI Act clarify that where an AI system processes personal data, both a DPIA and an FRIA may be required, and organizations should coordinate these assessments to avoid duplication.

FRIA vs. DPIA — Comparison

DimensionFRIA (EU AI Act Art. 27)DPIA (GDPR Art. 35)
Legal basisEU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689GDPR Article 35
Scope of rights assessedBroad fundamental rights: non-discrimination, dignity, freedom of expression, access to servicesData protection and privacy rights
TriggerDeployment of high-risk AI system (Annex III) by covered deployersProcessing likely to result in high risk to data subjects
Consultation requirementAffected groups or their representatives (Art. 27(1)(c))DPO advice; supervisory authority if residual risk is high
Update obligationWhen conditions change or system is updated/redeployedWhen nature, scope, context, or purposes change
Effective date2 August 202625 May 2018 (in force)

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA) under the EU AI Act?

A Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA) is a mandatory evaluation required by Article 27 of the EU AI Act. Deployers of high-risk AI systems must assess the impact on fundamental rights — including non-discrimination, privacy, freedom of expression, and human dignity — before putting the system into use. The assessment must document affected groups, specific risks, human oversight measures, and consultation with affected parties.

Who is required to conduct an FRIA under Article 27?

Under Article 27, deployers that are bodies governed by public law, private operators providing public services, and deployers of certain Annex III high-risk AI systems (such as credit scoring, insurance pricing, and law enforcement applications) must conduct an FRIA before first use. The obligation applies from 2 August 2026.

How does an FRIA differ from a DPIA under GDPR?

A DPIA under GDPR Article 35 focuses on risks to personal data protection, while an FRIA covers a broader set of fundamental rights. The FRIA also requires consultation with affected groups and must be updated whenever conditions change. The EDPB Guidelines 07/2024 recommend coordinating both assessments where an AI system processes personal data.

When does the FRIA obligation take effect?

The FRIA obligation under Article 27 of the EU AI Act applies from 2 August 2026. Deployers must have completed their first FRIA before putting a covered high-risk AI system into use after that date.

What must an FRIA contain according to Article 27?

Article 27 requires the FRIA to include: a description of the deployer's processes involving the high-risk AI system, the period and frequency of use, categories of affected natural persons and groups, specific risks of harm to fundamental rights, human oversight measures, and measures to be taken if risks materialise. Consultation with affected groups or their representatives is required where appropriate.

Can an FRIA be combined with a DPIA?

Yes. Article 27(4) of the EU AI Act explicitly states that the FRIA may be conducted as part of an existing DPIA under GDPR Article 35, provided all FRIA-specific elements are addressed. Priverion supports this by allowing DPIA data — processing purposes, data categories, risk ratings, and safeguards — to be referenced or linked within the FRIA workflow.

How often must an FRIA be updated?

The EU AI Act requires the FRIA to be updated when the deployer considers that any of the relevant factors have changed. This includes changes to the AI system itself, its deployment context, the affected population, or the risk profile. Priverion's automated recertification engine triggers reassessments based on configurable schedules or system-change events.

Does Priverion support multi-entity FRIA rollout?

Yes. Priverion's multi-entity architecture allows organizations to deploy FRIA workflows across all subsidiaries from a centralized admin view, assign responsibility to local DPOs or AI governance leads, track completion status, and generate group-level reporting. This mirrors the multi-entity ROPA workflow used by customers such as Aircraft manufacturer.