The European Alternative to US Privacy Software . Built in Switzerland, Trusted Across the EU
You're managing GDPR compliance, Schrems II obligations, and cross-border data transfers , so why is your privacy tool hosted in a jurisdiction that undermines all three?
US-based privacy software vendors are subject to FISA 702, the CLOUD Act, and executive orders that can be revoked without legislative process. For European privacy teams, this creates an unresolvable contradiction: the tool you use to prove compliance may itself be a compliance risk. Priverion is the privacy program management platform built from the ground up for European data protection reality . Swiss-hosted, GDPR-native, and architected for multi-entity organizations.
30-minute walkthrough. No sales pressure. See your use case live.
US-Based Privacy Tools Create the Risk They Claim to Manage
Your privacy management platform holds your most sensitive compliance data , processing activities, risk assessments, breach records, data subject details. When that platform is subject to US jurisdiction, every record inside it becomes a potential exposure point.
FISA 702 and the CLOUD Act
US authorities can compel any US-headquartered vendor to hand over data stored anywhere in the world , including data about your European data subjects, your processing activities, and your risk assessments. Your Record of Processing Activities is not exempt. Neither are your DPIAs, breach logs, or vendor assessments.
The result: The tool you use to demonstrate GDPR compliance may itself be a vector for unauthorized third-country access to personal data.
Source: 50 U.S.C. §1881a (FISA Section 702); 18 U.S.C. §2713 (CLOUD Act, 2018)
Schrems II and Transfer Impact Assessments
If your privacy management platform itself requires a Transfer Impact Assessment to justify its use, something has gone fundamentally wrong. Many organizations are conducting DPIAs and TIAs inside tools that are themselves the subject of unresolved transfer risk , a circular dependency that supervisory authorities are increasingly scrutinizing.
The result: Your compliance platform becomes a line item on your own risk register , requiring ongoing justification instead of providing it.
Source: CJEU Case C-311/18 (Schrems II), July 2020; EDPB Recommendations 01/2020
Executive Order Fragility
The current EU-US Data Privacy Framework rests on Executive Order 14086, which can be modified or revoked without legislative process. This is not a theoretical concern . it is a structural vulnerability that European data protection authorities, including the EDPB, have flagged repeatedly. Building your compliance program on a foundation that can shift with a single executive action is an avoidable risk.
The result: Every vendor relationship built on the DPF carries an implicit "until further notice" caveat that may require emergency re-evaluation at any time.
Source: EO 14086, October 2022; European Commission adequacy decision, July 2023; EDPB Information Note, 2023
You don't need a privacy tool that adds a line item to your risk register. You need one that removes it.
Customer Results
200+
Hours saved on ROPA management
Medtec reclaimed 200+ hours previously spent on manual ROPA updates during their ISO 27001 preparation , time redirected to strategic privacy work.
60%
Lower cost vs. OneTrust
Based on published pricing comparisons for mid-market organizations with 5–50 entities. No per-user fees, no per-module expansion traps , predictable costs from day one.
3 mo
Ahead of schedule on ISO 27001
Medtec accelerated their ISO 27001 certification timeline by three months using Priverion's audit-ready evidence packages and automated documentation workflows.
Enterprise-grade compliance without the enterprise headache
Mid-market companies don't need a platform built for Fortune 500 procurement cycles. They need one that actually works for how they operate , across subsidiaries, across borders, without a six-figure budget.
What you get with Priverion
Swiss-hosted data sovereignty
All data processed and stored within Swiss infrastructure. In a post-Schrems II world, this isn't a preference . it's a legal safeguard for cross-border transfers. No US Cloud Act exposure. No adequacy decision anxiety.
Pricing that doesn't punish growth
Based on number of companies and organizational size , not per-user or per-module. Add a new subsidiary without renegotiating your contract. Add team members without watching your invoice climb.
One platform, not a module maze
ROPA, DPIA, vendor assessments, DSR handling, incident management, and AI Act readiness , all included. No upsell calls every quarter. No feature gates behind premium tiers.
Built for DPOs, not IT departments
Operational in weeks, not months. Business users manage recertification, vendor assessments, and incident workflows without needing a dedicated admin team or a consultant to configure it.
European data residency as standard
Swiss origin isn't a feature checkbox . it's our identity. Every component of the platform, from AI processing to audit logs, stays within European jurisdiction. Your DPA review just got simpler.
The typical enterprise platform experience
US-hosted with opt-in EU residency
Data residency options exist, but the default architecture is US-based. That means additional contractual complexity, ongoing adequacy assessments, and risk exposure to foreign surveillance frameworks your legal team has to evaluate continuously.
Per-user, per-module pricing
Start with a reasonable quote. Then the expansion begins: each new module, each new user seat, each new subsidiary entity. By year two, the platform costs more than the compliance risk it was meant to reduce.
Feature sprawl across 15+ modules
ESG, ethics hotlines, cookie consent, third-party risk, GRC , a platform trying to be everything for everyone. If your team needs focused privacy program management, 80% of the platform sits unused while you pay for all of it.
Months-long implementation cycles
Enterprise platforms require dedicated implementation partners, custom configuration projects, and ongoing admin resources. For a 15-subsidiary organization, you're looking at 6-12 months before the first recertification cycle runs.
200 integrations, most shallow
A long integrations list looks impressive in a procurement spreadsheet. In practice, many are surface-level connectors that require custom middleware to function reliably , creating maintenance overhead your IT team didn't sign up for.
We're transparent about what we don't do: we don't cover ESG, ethics hotlines, or cookie consent. Our strength is multi-entity privacy program management , and we do it better than anyone.
The European Privacy Platform Buyer's Guide: What to Evaluate Before You Switch
A practical framework for privacy teams evaluating European alternatives to US-hosted platforms. Built from real migration experiences , not vendor marketing.
Inside the guide:
- The post-Schrems II data residency checklist , 9 questions your legal team should ask every vendor about cross-border data transfers
- Feature comparison matrix covering ROPA automation, DPIA workflows, vendor risk assessments, and incident management across 6 European platforms
- Total cost of ownership calculator , how to compare per-user pricing vs. per-entity pricing for multi-subsidiary organizations
- Migration timeline benchmarks based on real customer data , including how Aircraft manufacturer achieved full operational status in weeks, not months
Free PDF. No demo required. We'll send it to your inbox.
Stop managing privacy in spreadsheets
Your group-wide privacy program deserves 30 minutes of clarity
See how organizations like Aircraft manufacturer cut compliance admin time by 60% in their first six months , and how your team can stop chasing subsidiaries for ROPA updates and start doing strategic privacy work instead.
No sales pitch. A live look at how Priverion works for organizations like yours. Operational in weeks, not months.