Stop Guessing Whether You Need a DPIA: Get Automated Compliance Guidance in Minutes
Get the exact framework to distinguish DPIAs from general privacy assessments, then automate the entire process across every subsidiary.
No credit card required. No spam. Your data stays in Swiss infrastructure.
"We were spending 60% of our compliance admin time chasing business units across subsidiaries for ROPA updates. In six months with Priverion, recertification was fully automated. I finally focus on strategic privacy work instead of maintaining spreadsheets."
Multi-subsidiary aerospace manufacturer, GDPR compliance across group entities
Stop Over-Engineering Assessments. Start Running Them Right.
Understanding the difference between a DPIA and a PIA is step one. Operationalizing it across every subsidiary, without spreadsheets, is where most teams get stuck.
AI-Assisted DPIA Drafting
Priverion's AI pre-populates DPIA documentation based on your processing activity descriptions, mapping risks to EDPB criteria and suggesting mitigation measures. You review and approve every output before it becomes a compliance record. AI assists, humans decide.
200+ hours saved in ISO 27001 preparation
A medical technology company, first 6 months of implementation
Automated Recertification Across Entities
DPIAs are not one-time exercises. Article 35(11) requires ongoing review. Priverion automatically triggers recertification workflows when processing changes, timelines expire, or regulatory guidance updates. No more chasing business units across subsidiaries.
100% ROPA recertification rate, fully automated
A Swiss insurer, across all group entities
Audit-Ready Evidence in Minutes
When a supervisory authority requests your DPIA documentation, you need complete Article 35(7) packages, not scattered files across shared drives. Priverion generates structured, regulator-ready evidence packages covering processing descriptions, necessity assessments, risk evaluations, and mitigation measures.
60% reduction in compliance admin time
Aircraft manufacturer, first 6 months of implementation
200+
Hours saved on ISO 27001 preparation
A medical technology company, measured across documentation, evidence gathering, and audit prep in their first compliance cycle with Priverion
60%
Lower cost vs. OneTrust for equivalent privacy program scope
Aircraft manufacturer, based on comparative pricing for multi-entity ROPA, DPIA, and vendor management modules at contract evaluation
3 mo
Ahead of schedule on ISO 27001 certification timeline
A medical technology company, accelerated through automated evidence collection, pre-mapped controls, and audit-ready documentation packages
Enterprise-grade privacy management without the enterprise headache
Mid-market companies don't need 200 shallow integrations or a six-figure contract to manage privacy across subsidiaries. Here's why teams like Aircraft manufacturer and a healthcare provider chose Priverion.
"We evaluated OneTrust and two other platforms. Priverion gave us everything we needed for group-wide ROPA management at a fraction of the cost, and we were operational in weeks, not months."
60% reduction in compliance admin time within 6 months
The typical enterprise platform
- Per-user, per-module pricing Costs balloon as you add subsidiaries, users, or modules. Budget surprises every renewal cycle.
- US-headquartered, US-hosted Subject to CLOUD Act and FISA 702. Post-Schrems II, cross-border data transfers face ongoing legal uncertainty.
- 200+ integrations, most shallow Impressive on a feature comparison sheet. In practice: maintenance overhead, broken connectors, and data that doesn't actually flow where you need it.
- 6-12 month implementation Dedicated implementation teams, professional services fees, and months before anyone logs in productively.
- Built for the Fortune 500 Feature-rich but complex. Mid-market teams end up paying for ESG modules, ethics hotlines, and cookie consent tools they'll never configure.
Priverion
- Predictable pricing by company size Based on number of entities and organizational size, not per-user or per-module. No expansion traps. Scale your group without scaling your invoice.
- Swiss-built, Swiss-hosted All data processed within Swiss infrastructure. European data residency by design. In a post-Schrems II world, this isn't a marketing checkbox; it's a legal advantage.
- Deep integrations where it matters HR, procurement, IT asset management: the systems that actually drive privacy workflows. Fewer connectors, better data flow, less maintenance.
- Operational in weeks, not months Aircraft manufacturer achieved 60% reduction in compliance admin time within their first 6 months. A Swiss insurer reached 100% ROPA recertification, fully automated. Based on customer-reported outcomes, 2023-2024
- Built for multi-entity mid-market ROPA, DPIA, vendor assessments, DSRs, incident management, and AI Act readiness, all in one platform. No modules you'll never use. No features you'll never configure.
Stop managing privacy across spreadsheets. Start managing it from one platform.
See how Priverion gives multi-entity organizations group-wide visibility, automated recertification, and audit-ready evidence, all hosted in Switzerland.
"We went from chasing business units across subsidiaries for ROPA updates to fully automated recertification. Our DPO now focuses on strategic privacy work instead of spreadsheet maintenance."
Weeks
Time to go live, not months
50+
Entities managed on one platform
100%
Swiss data residency
No commitment. No sales deck. Just a live walkthrough tailored to your group structure.
▸ About this page: references, definitions, and FAQs
Key Takeaways
A Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) is a legally mandated process under GDPR Article 35, required whenever data processing is likely to result in a high risk to individuals' rights and freedoms. A Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) is a broader, voluntary risk-management tool used to evaluate privacy implications of any project. Understanding when each applies (and automating the workflow across subsidiaries) is critical for multi-entity compliance programs operating under GDPR, the Swiss FADP, and ISO 27001.
What is a DPIA?
A Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) is a structured process mandated by GDPR Article 35 that requires data controllers to assess the impact of processing operations on the protection of personal data. It must be carried out before processing begins when the activity is "likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons." The EDPB Guidelines on DPIAs (WP248 rev.01) identify nine criteria for determining when a DPIA is required, including evaluation or scoring, automated decision-making with legal effects, systematic monitoring, and large-scale processing of sensitive data.
What is a Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA)?
A Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) is a broader risk-management methodology that evaluates how a project, system, or process collects, uses, shares, and protects personal information. Unlike a DPIA, a PIA is not mandated by a single regulation but is recommended by frameworks such as ISO/IEC 29134:2023 (Guidelines for privacy impact assessment) and NIST SP 800-122. PIAs are commonly used in jurisdictions without GDPR-equivalent DPIA requirements and as an early-stage screening tool to determine whether a full DPIA is needed.
DPIA vs PIA: Comparison Table
| Criterion | DPIA (GDPR Article 35) | PIA (General Practice) |
|---|---|---|
| Legal basis | Mandatory under GDPR Art. 35; Swiss FADP Art. 22 | Voluntary; recommended by ISO 29134, NIST |
| Trigger | High risk to rights and freedoms of data subjects | Any new project, system, or process involving personal data |
| Mandatory elements | Four elements defined in Art. 35(7): description, necessity, risk assessment, mitigation | Flexible; varies by framework |
| Supervisory authority consultation | Required if residual high risk remains (Art. 36) | Not required |
| Penalties for non-compliance | Up to EUR 10 million or 2% global turnover (Art. 83(4)(a)) | None (voluntary) |
| Review requirement | Ongoing review required (Art. 35(11)) | Best practice; not legally mandated |
| Scope | Specific processing operations | Broader project or system scope |
When is a DPIA legally required under GDPR?
GDPR Article 35(3) lists three scenarios where a DPIA is always required: (a) systematic and extensive evaluation of personal aspects based on automated processing, including profiling, that produces legal effects; (b) large-scale processing of special categories of data under Article 9(1) or criminal conviction data under Article 10; and (c) systematic monitoring of a publicly accessible area on a large scale. Beyond these, the EDPB's nine criteria provide further guidance: if a processing activity meets two or more criteria, a DPIA is generally required.
What must a DPIA contain according to GDPR Article 35(7)?
According to GDPR Article 35(7), a DPIA must contain at minimum: (a) a systematic description of the envisaged processing operations and the purposes of the processing, including, where applicable, the legitimate interest pursued by the controller; (b) an assessment of the necessity and proportionality of the processing operations in relation to the purposes; (c) an assessment of the risks to the rights and freedoms of data subjects; and (d) the measures envisaged to address the risks, including safeguards, security measures, and mechanisms to ensure the protection of personal data.
Does the Swiss FADP require DPIAs?
Yes. The revised Swiss Federal Act on Data Protection (FADP), which entered into force on September 1, 2023, requires a Data Protection Impact Assessment under Article 22 when processing is likely to result in a high risk to the personality or fundamental rights of data subjects. If the assessment shows that the planned processing still entails a high risk despite the measures taken, the controller must consult the Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner (FDPIC) before proceeding.
How often should a DPIA be reviewed?
GDPR Article 35(11) requires that controllers carry out a review of the DPIA "at least when there is a change in the risk represented by processing operations." The EDPB recommends continuous review, particularly when the nature, scope, context, or purposes of processing change, when new technologies are introduced, or when the organizational or societal context evolves. According to the IAPP-EY 2023 Privacy Governance Report, 68% of organizations with mature privacy programs review DPIAs at least annually.
What is the penalty for not conducting a required DPIA?
Under GDPR Article 83(4)(a), failure to carry out a required DPIA can result in administrative fines of up to EUR 10 million or 2% of the undertaking's total annual worldwide turnover, whichever is higher. Supervisory authorities across Europe have enforced this provision. According to EDPB enforcement data, DPIA-related violations have been cited in multiple enforcement actions since 2018.
Statistics and Industry Context
According to the IAPP-EY 2023 Privacy Governance Report, the average organization now employs 5.2 full-time privacy staff, up from 3.7 in 2020, reflecting growing regulatory complexity. The same report found that 59% of organizations conduct DPIAs for all high-risk processing activities. A Gartner forecast projects that by 2025, 75% of the world's population will have personal data covered under modern privacy regulations, making structured impact assessments increasingly critical. The ENISA Data Protection Engineering report emphasizes that DPIAs should be integrated into the system development lifecycle rather than treated as a one-time compliance checkbox.
